After a Long Weekend: What Employees Actually Read (and how to learn fast)

Monday after a long weekend is a bad time to “send and hope.”

Employees come back to a pile of email, Teams pings, calendar churn, and a to-do list that’s already late. They will not “catch up” on your update just because it matters to you.

So here’s the practical goal for post-holiday comms: Learn fast what employees actually read, then adjust next send based on evidence—not gut feel.

This is tool-agnostic. You can do a basic version with almost any email platform. But you should know the ceiling: basic email tools don’t provide credible visibility into employee behavior. “Sent” isn’t “seen.” “Opened” is often unreliable. And Outlook/Gmail won’t tell you what people skimmed, where they dropped, or what content actually got attention.

Let’s fix what you can this week.

What employees actually read (focus keyword) is usually the smallest, clearest thing

After a long weekend, employees tend to read content that is:

1. Immediately relevant (today/this week, not “soon”)

2. Specific (clear action, clear deadline, clear owner)

3. Low-friction (short, scannable, no attachment hunting)

4. Trustworthy (not vague, not “FYI,” not buried in a wall of text)

If your email makes employees work to find the point, they won’t.

The 30-minute “Learn Fast” workflow (run this every post-holiday Monday)

Step 1: Pick one message to treat as your signalChoose the email you most need employees to read: policy change, deadline, return-to-work update, benefits, manager action.

Don’t try to analyze five messages. You’ll do none of them well.

Step 2: Define “read” as a behavior, not a feeling

Use one of these definitions:

• Read = clicked a primary link (best available proxy)

• Read = completed a single action (submitted a form, booked a slot, viewed a page)

• Read = replied with the correct keyword (for tiny audiences)

If your email has no measurable behavior, you’ve built a black box.

Step 3: Rewrite the subject line for the employee, not the senderBad: “Updates following the holiday weekend”Better: “Today: Confirm your schedule by 3pm”Best: “Action today (3 min): Confirm schedule by 3pm”

Step 4: Put the “ask” in the first 120 charactersAssume mobile preview. Assume skimming.If the employee has to open to find out what you want, you lose.

Step 5: Use a single primary call-to-actionOne button or one link. Not five.If you need multiple resources, put them behind the primary CTA page.

Step 6: Use a two-layer structure

• Layer 1: The action (what, by when, link)

• Layer 2: The context (why, who it affects, where to get help)

Step 7: Set a time-boxed review Check results at:

• 2 hours (early signal)

• 24 hours (most of the story)

• 72 hours (long tail)

Write down what you learned. Otherwise you’ll repeat the same “Monday after holiday” mistakes forever.

The “What Employees Actually Read” scorecard (steal this)

Copy/paste this into a doc or spreadsheet. Score each email 0–2 per line.

WHAT EMPLOYEES ACTUALLY READ — SCORECARD (0–20)

A) Relevance now (0–2)

• 0: Not time-bound or not urgent

• 1: Time-bound but not clearly “this week”

• 2: Tied to today/this week with a specific deadline

B) Clarity of ask (0–2)

• 0: No clear action

• 1: Action exists but buried

• 2: Action is explicit and early

C) Scan-ability (0–2)

• 0: Dense paragraphs, multiple topics

• 1: Some structure, still heavy

• 2: Short blocks, bullets, clear headings

D) Single primary CTA (0–2)

• 0: Many competing links

• 1: One main link but distractions remain

• 2: One clear CTA, everything else secondary

E) Audience fit (0–2)

• 0: Sent broadly “just in case”

• 1: Some targeting, still too wide

• 2: Targeted to who must act

F) Channel match (0–2)

• 0: Email used for something better handled elsewhere

• 1: Mixed fit

• 2: Email is the right channel for the job

G) Effort required (0–2)

• 0: Employees must hunt for info

• 1: Some friction remains

• 2: One-click path to complete action

H) Credibility/trust (0–2)

• 0: Vague, no owner, no source

• 1: Some specifics

• 2: Clear owner, clear policy/source, clear support path

I) Manager enablement (0–2)

• 0: Managers will be asked but not equipped

• 1: Some help

• 2: Includes a manager-ready 3-line script

J) Measurement hook (0–2)

• 0: No trackable behavior

• 1: Weak proxy

• 2: Clear measurable action

How to use it:

• Score your last post-holiday email.

• Fix the lowest two sections for the next send.

• Stop “rewriting everything.” Change the leverage points.

Before-and-after example (realistic, not pretty)

BEFORE (what employees ignore)Subject: “Important updates following the long weekend”Body (first lines): “We hope you enjoyed the holiday. We wanted to share a few reminders and updates…”Links: 6 links to intranet pagesResult: People skim, miss the one thing that matters, managers get pinged all day.

AFTER (what employees read)Subject: “Action today (3 min): Confirm your schedule by 3pm”First line: “Confirm your schedule for this week by 3pm today: [link]”Second block: “Who this applies to: hourly teams + customer support”Third block: “Need help? Reply to this email with ‘SCHEDULE’ and we’ll assist.”Result: Fewer questions, faster compliance, less manager cleanup.

Diagnostic questions (use these when a leader says “send it to everyone”)

Ask these five questions before you hit send:

1. What do we need people to do differently by a specific date/time?

2. Who exactly must act (and who is just curious)?

3. What is the one click we want them to take?

4. What will confuse them in the first 10 seconds?

5. What will managers be asked—and what’s the 3-line answer?

If you can’t answer #1 or #3, you’re not sending comms. You’re broadcasting anxiety.

Why basic email tools don’t give credible visibility

Most teams rely on Outlook/Gmail and “standard” email sends. The problem isn’t effort. It’s visibility.

Common gaps:

• Open data is often unreliable (privacy changes, preview panes, blocked tracking)

• You can’t see what content was actually consumed

• You can’t compare performance by audience group in a meaningful way

• You can’t consistently attribute outcomes to specific comms patterns

So you end up debating opinions: “People don’t read.” “They do read, they just don’t click.” “Maybe the subject line was bad.” That’s not strategy. That’s noise.

You can still improve without perfect analytics (use the scorecard + measurable CTAs). But if leadership wants proof, you need better instrumentation.

If you have analytics (like Broadcast Insights 3.0), here’s how to level up

If you have a real measurement layer, use it to move from “did it send?” to “did it work?”

Here’s a simple upgrade path:

1. Segment your audiences like a pro

Start with three buckets:

• Must act (compliance/operational impact)

• Should know (context, awareness)

• Nice to know (optional)

Then send different versions. Short for “must act.” Context for “should know.” Optional content can live elsewhere.

2. Build a repeatable post-holiday benchmark

Track the same three signals every time:

• Speed to engagement (first 2 hours)

• Completion rate (by 24 hours)

• Drop-off patterns (what people ignore consistently)

3. Identify your top two “read drivers

Across 4–6 sends, your winners usually come down to:

• Tight subject lines that state the action + time

• One primary CTA above the scroll

Lock those in as standards.

4. Create a monthly “What employees actually read” report

One page. No fluff.

• Top 3 messages by engagement/action

• Bottom 3 with likely causes (scorecard categories)

• Two changes you’ll make next month

• One risk if nothing changes (missed deadlines, manager burden, repeat questions)

That’s the kind of proof leaders understand.

(And yes: a platform like Cerkl Broadcast + Broadcast Insights 3.0 can make this easier by adding targeting and deeper analytics once you’ve built your Foundations.)

Checklist: Post-holiday send (copy/paste)

POST-HOLIDAY EMAIL CHECKLIST (10 items)

• One message only (no “few updates” bundles)

• Subject includes action + deadline

• Ask appears in first 120 characters

• One primary CTA link/button

• Targeted audience (not “everyone”)

• Two-layer structure (action first, context second)

• Manager script included (3 lines)

• Help path included (reply keyword or contact)

• Measurement hook exists (click/action/reply)

• Review results at 2h, 24h, 72h and record learnings

What’s Next

Sign up for our newsletter to get actionable insights like these delivered to your inbox from across the web at a cadence that suits you.

If you’re already on Cerkl Broadcast, ask for a quick walkthrough of how Broadcast Insights 3.0 can help you see what’s landing, by audience, without hand-waving.